Trump vs. Amazon & Co .: The US President and the large corporations: Why Trump was already in a clinch with Amazon, Huawei, Twitter and Co. | message
Shares in this article
Causes not infrequently personal
Allegations of espionage fuel trade conflict with China
Social media targeted by the US President
Trump vs. Amazon: What the argument with Jeff Bezos was about
The dispute between the world’s most powerful and richest man culminated in July 2018, when controversy arose over a lucrative U.S. Department of Defense IT contract. It was about equipping the US military with a centralized computer system using cloud technology. A billion-dollar deal that the corporations Oracle, Microsoft and Amazon fought for. In the race for this order, Amazon was treated as a favorite because of the long-standing cooperation between the Amazon web services and the US government. Ultimately, however, the contract went to Microsoft in a surprising manner. The reason for this is a personal revenge campaign by the US President against the Amazon boss and Washington Post owner Jeff Bezos. The Microsoft selection was followed by a lawsuit against Bezos vs. Trump, in which the Amazon chief submitted a 103-page indictment to the court, which contained Trump’s tweets as well as other statements and evidence that the Vendetta allegations should prove. Trump not only denied any allegations, but also made charges against the entrepreneur.
In the battle of the giants, both parties proved to be extremely conflict-conscious and stubborn, so that an ongoing exchange of blows developed between Trump and Bezos. As for the reason for Trump’s massive aversion to Bezos, it is reasonable to assume that this results from Bezos’ ownership of the Washington Post. The newspaper frequently publishes content critical of the government that denounces the US President and his official acts. In return, he then describes them as “fake news” and “propaganda machines” that Bezos uses for “his lobbying”. However, the US president does not provide evidence of his allegations.
The US president against Huawei
Trade relations between the United States and China are marked by sanctions and restrictions. The US president is particularly targeting the smartphone manufacturer Huawei. This is at the heart of the trade conflict, as the U.S. government accuses Huawei of being involved in espionage activity. According to Trump, the second largest smartphone manufacturer in the world is supposed to siphon out western countries and pass the information on to the Chinese government. The U.S. government’s attempts to push the Chinese company out of business by expanding its fifth-generation mobile network infrastructure (5G) are based on this assumption.
The sanctions are accompanied by severe restrictions on smartphone functionality. So z. B. Google services are not implemented on new smartphones. Users can therefore neither applications such as Google, YouTube and Gmail, nor the Google Play Use the store, which is sometimes the largest point of contact for apps. Huawei tries to counter this with its own solutions, but cannot yet replace the enormously large infrastructure of the Internet giant Google.
Models that are already on the market have a Google license, so users do not have to worry about not receiving updates from Google Services. Huawei uses this in its favor by producing new editions of the Huawei P30, a top seller from 2019. Since the American networks are now using Huawei’s transmission technology, the US government is also frequently approving exemptions for sanctions in this way Avoid network outages in rural areas of the United States. However, an end to the US embargo is not yet in sight.
How so Donald Trump against Twitter
Even with the social media platform Twitter that he regularly uses, Trump is now on a confrontational course. This was triggered by the blocking of a video that the US President uploaded to the short message service in his timeline. This included photos and sequences of protest marches in memory of George Floyd, backed by the words of the US president. Twitter blocked the video a short time later due to copyright issues and violence. Since then, Trump has accused the company of deliberately censoring its “edifying and unifying message”.
At the end of May, Trump accused Twitter of “political activism” after a post had been subjected to a fact check and failed. As a consequence, the platform provided its tweet with a hint that prompted the public to question the veracity of the statement. In addition to a post with invalid information, there was another tweet that had to be given a warning. It was a threat to the current protests: “When plundering begins, shooting begins.” Twitter attached a warning to Trump’s post regarding the glorification of violence, whereupon the US government criticized this approach. The conflict even went so far that Trump signed a regulation under which certain online platform protection mechanisms could be overridden. The reason for this decision, according to the US President, is the increasing lack of neutrality.
The social media platform does not rule out a blocking of the US President’s account should further violations of the Twitter rules occur. Nick Pickles, Twitter’s chief of strategy, recently announced this in the British Parliament. That would be a big blow to the US President, since his Twitter account with over 81 million followers is his most important mouthpiece and is used particularly during election campaign times. The online service Snapchat also announced procedures that should help to place Trump’s posts less conspicuously in order to reduce its reach. Snapchat wants to “not be an amplifier for voices that fuel racist violence and injustice”.
How 3M aroused the US President’s anger
3M is a multi-technology group that manufactures over 50,000 different products – including face masks that became a valuable commodity in the Corona crisis. At the beginning of the pandemic, the US president was still positive about the company and celebrated it as a kind of rescuer in need. However, his opinion changed recently because, in his view, 3M did not provide enough masks at home, but exported too many abroad. Trump reacted with a drastic step: he wants to use the War Economy Act to force 3M to produce more masks for the United States. The law dates from the Korean War and was designed to allow companies to produce goods for the country without incurring major domestic surcharges.
The list of companies with which the US president is in a clinch could go on and on at this point. Other controversial partners include General Motors, CNN and the traditional company Harley Davidson.
Editorial office Forex-news.com.net
More news about Amazon
Image sources: John Moore / Getty Images